This week we are launching one of the most significant research reports we have published to date: High Impact Learning Culture®: 40 Practices for and Empowered Enterprise. The core of this report is one major finding: among all the HR and training processes we study, the single biggest driver of business impact is the strength of an organization's learning culture.
At first glance, of course, this appears to be a very vague and undefined statement. But over the last two years, under the leadership of David Mallon, we studied this area and have now published 40 practices which will directly improve your organization's learning culture.
This research was extensive: over more than six years studying best-practices in corporate training, we identified more than 100 possible business processes, programs, and strategies which fall into the area of "culture." These include many formal things like "creating development plans" and many informal things like "regularly conducting after-action reviews" and "leaders listen to mistakes."
During 2008 and 2009 we interviewed and surveyed over 40,000 organizations to understand how well they adopted these practices and simultaneously studied how well these organizations performed on ten well-defined business measures (innovation, workforce productivity, time to market, customer satisfaction, customer responsiveness, customer input, workforce expertise, learning agility, and cost structure).
After correlating this information carefully we found that among all industries and company sizes, there are 40 practices which rise to the top. These practices we call the "40 High-Impact Practices for a Learning Culture" - and as you read them you will see many things your organization can do better.
What is Culture Anyway - and why is Learning Culture Important?
Let me speak briefly how culture and why it is so important.
The topic of culture is not new. Many have studied this topic, including Edgar Schein from MIT (who's book The Corporate Culture Survival Guide informed much of our research), Chris Argyris (who pioneered the concept of "double loop learning" - rethinking your assumptions as part of a learning process), Peter Senge (author of The Fifth Discipline, the Art and Science of the Learning Organization), and Kim Cameron and Robert E. Quinn, who authored Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Change, The Competing Values Framework, a book I found very transformational in my own thinking.
These experts, along with many others, have pointed out that culture is a real and changeable part of any organization. It can be monitored, measured, and adjusted. While changing culture is like "moving the mountain," you can in fact move it if you first understand what it is. A few keys to this topic:
Fig 1: The Simple Model of Organizational Learning Culture
As you can see from the model, the seven elements of culture are big: building trust, encouraging reflection, demonstrating the value of learning, enabling knowledge sharing, empowering employees, and formalizing learning. These are important strategies, each of which has many practices to consider.
One element which ranks very high in these seven is empowerment: without empowering employees to listen to customers, speak truth, make decisions, and control their environment, organizations fail to learn. One might guess that problems like the BP oil spill and the Toyota accelerator problem are rooted in a lack of empowerment, among other things.
In the last few months many of our clients have told us they have new CEO-level initiatives to "build a learning organization" and "drive innovation" in their organizations. What these executives are saying is that "what worked in the past doesn't seem to be working now." Given the tremendous changes in technology, communications, environmentalism, and consumer demographics this is no surprise.
Our findings point out clearly that the solution to this challenge is to create a "continuous learning curve" - one which forces the company (and its leaders) to constantly challenge existing assumptions and try new things. Chris Argyris calls this "double loop learning" - I like C. K. Prahalad's better words, the need to create the "forgetting curve."
Remember "The HP Way?" and "The Xerox Way" and "The Toyota Way?" These were all efforts by a company to institutionalize their own learning curves - what worked for them. Unfortunately all these systems, philosophies, and cultures had to change over time. And the biggest threat here is not failure but success - when "your way" works you become blind to the things that change around you.
The Story of IBM's SNA
I remember vividly my days at IBM when the company essentially owned the market for computer networking. Believe it or not (and many of you are probably too young to have experienced this), in the 1970s and 1980s, before TCP/IP and the internet became popular, almost all business computers in the world were connected to each other using a technology called SNA ("Systems Network Architecture"), a set of proprietary protocols by IBM.
SNA was a brilliant technology - it enables applications and systems to talk with each other on a peer-to-peer basis long before we even had PCs. It ran on low speed and high speed connections, it was secure, and it was cleanly layered so any software engineer could understand it. And it was hard-coded into IBM's proprietary communications controllers (called 37xx devices) which cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. And all IBM customers gladly purchased these things since they worked so well.
Around the mid 1980s, when PCs became popular, a small company called Sun Microsystems took some academic and government technologies called TCP/IP and started selling it into the business world. In a very short period of time, engineering computers and then later database systems started using these open protocols - and slowly but surely big companies realized they could get their computers to talk with each other without the use of SNA.
IBM, of course, spent many years in denial. The general manager of the SNA business was famous around my sales team for being one of the most hated executives in the company. Our customers were rapidly adopting this new, almost free technology, and we could not get the SNA people (who happened to be in Raleigh, NC) to pay attention. We used to have a joke, "if Raleigh made vacuum cleaners, they wouldnt suck."
Guess what happened. A little company named Cisco figured this out and wiped out IBM's multi-billion dollar networking business in less than 10 years. IBM was so successful with SNA that the company simply could not learn fast-enough. The billions of dollars of 37xx and SNA software revenues were blinding the IBM executives toward the huge, rapid, transformational change which took place. Somewhere in Raleigh, I'm sure there was a philosophy of "leaders are not open to bad news" (#1 in our top 40 practices for high-impact learning culture).
To give you an example of how important this topic is today: Cisco, one of the most creative companies we have the opportunity to work with, has taken its top leaders and put them into a highly unstructured leadership development program they call the "Center for Collaborative Leadership." These leaders are expected to break down existing barries and build new businesses as part of their development plan - and these businesses get funded and go live. The Cisco Telepresence business and acquisition of Tandberg grew out of this approach.
Bottom Line - You can Transform and Build a Learning Culture:
The reason I am so excited about this research is that we took this amorphous concept of "learning culture" and nailed down some very specific things you can do. You can diagnose your learning culture and you can change it. No matter how big your organization is, you cannot ignore this topic.
The concepts of organizational learning have been around for years. Well-used phrases like "continuous reinvention (Hammer)," and "only the paranoid survive (Grove)," and "if it ain't broken, break it (Welch)" are not just cute concepts - they reflect the actions of a thriving, enduring, continuous learning organization.
We hope that in this research we have given you the tools to clearly understand your culture, diagnose its weaknesses, and put in place strategies to improve.
I look forward to hearing from you on this important topic.
Add to del.icio.us Digg ThisDZone it!
Friday, June 18, 2010 08:04
Pingback from topsy.com
Twitter Trackbacks for How to Build a High-Impact Learning Culture [bersin.com] on Topsy.com
Posted by topsy.com
Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:26
I really thank you for making me feel so delighted after reading it out.http://www.johareez.com/
Posted by Anonymous
Monday, April 16, 2012 17:54
Pingback from yourtalenthub.com
The End of “Jobs” … « Talent Hub
Posted by yourtalenthub.com
Monday, February 18, 2013 11:26
Pingback from wolslegerpool.wordpress.com
The End of a Job as We Know It.. « High Impact Learning
Posted by wolslegerpool.wordpress.com
Sunday, May 12, 2013 09:09
Pingback from ronwolsleger.com
The End of a Job as we know it….. | Ron Wolsleger
Posted by ronwolsleger.com
Tuesday, September 24, 2013 23:08
Pingback from iplaceconnect.com
Benefits of Developing a Learning Culture in an Organization | Post Jobs Online with iPlace Connect
Posted by iplaceconnect.com
Josh Bersin writes on the ever-changing landscape of business-driven learning, HR and talent management.
His favorite topics include strategic talent management, creating high-impact learning organizations,
and how organizations drive business change and competitive advantage through talent strategy and technology.
We would like your feedback on our website. Please send comments, questions or report problems to us at:» email@example.com