• Bersin by Deloitte
  • Register|Sign In|Research Store  Empty
    • Advanced Search
      • Research Library
      • Solutions Library

  • Bersin
  • Membership
  • Practices
    • Human Resources
    • Leadership Development
    • Learning & Development
    • Talent Acquisition
    • Talent Management
    • Solutions Library
  • News & Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Recordings
    • IMPACT
    • WhatWorks® Awards
    • Press Releases
    • News Articles
    • Newsletter
  • Blogs
    • The Business of Talent
    • Hire Innovation
    • Leadership Drives Business
    • HRevolution
    • Learning on the Leading Edge
    • Global Trends and Benchmarks
    • Planning for High Performance
    • Technology for Talent
  • Lexicon
  • About Us
    • Our Analysts
    • Executive Team
    • Our Consultants
    • Member List
    • Advisory Board
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Interested in Membership?

Home >  Analyst Blogs > Josh Bersin's Blog The Business of Talent

Social Networks Digg This LinkedIn Del.icio.us Facebook Yahoo! Buzz Newsvine

Close

The Business Case for Talent Management: Steve Ballmer Agrees

Sunday, January 22, 2012
Talent management makes money.

If you are trying to build a business case for a corporate talent management program, here is some astounding data:

Of the 700+ organizations we studied in 2010 and 2011, only 7% told us that they have a "strategic talent management" program. We defined talent management in four levels of maturity:

  • Silo'd (all HR practices operate seperately, with little standardization)
  • Standardized (HR practices standardizes, but not highly integrated with each other)
  • Integrated (A talent management leader in place, but integration still in process)
  • Strategic (A high degree of integration with business leaders taking charge for most talent practices).

Our research found that around the world, 28% of organizations are "silo'd", 45% are "standardized," 20% are "integrated," and 7% are "strategic." This data was collected through a variety of surveys and interviews. And this maturity is very slowly improving (only 5% were "strategic" in 2009).

Now the big news.  This pays off.

Companies at level 4 are generating more than twice the revenue per employee, 40% lower turnover rates, and 38% higher levels of employee engagement. And they also spend almost twice as much per employee on HR in general. So while this costs money, it really pays for itself.

Microsoft's Steve Ballmer proves the point.

Now let's look at a very specific example. BusinessWeek just published a fascinating interview with Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft. In this interview Mr. Ballmer discusses his growth as a leader, and explains that when he first got the job 3 1/2 years ago he believed that he could "muscle" most major decisions through the company. But Microsoft's tremendous failures with Vista demonstrated that the company was not working well together and there were not enough empowered leaders in engineering. Today Ballmer has totally changed his management philosophy and is now focused heavily on recruiting the right leaders and making them work together.

I spent a few days at Microsoft recently and after many years I felt a whole new energy. Product groups are clearly working more closely together, the company is now heavily focused on design and usability (Microsoft's new phone software is getting rave reviews), and I expect Windows 8 and Skype integration to be a huge home run for the company. If you read between the lines of Ballmer's interview (and visit Redmond), you can see that this turnaround is all about talent management and leadership. And today Microsoft's stock is at it's highest level in three years.

Talent Management is Good Business, not just Good HR.

As we discuss throughout our research, Talent Management is not an HR strategy, but a business strategy. HR's role is to design and promote the process, but it is up to line leaders to actually "run" talent management.  They are the "talent managers." So until and unless you have line leaders taking charge, this is all just more human resources administration. So only 7% of companies believe they have reached this level of management maturity.

And this is not really a surprise. Organizations must continuously invest in management and leadership training, because people are always getting "promoted" into leadership without the necessary skills (67% of respondents rate their first line leaders far-behind or well-behind in the skills they need to do their jobs). And the "Right" leaders for your company are unique to your own culture, business, and strategy.

By the way, talent management is not something you copy out of a book. Your talent management strategy is unique to you. If you are a fast-growing company, you may need to focus on strategic sourcing and building your employment brand. If you are globalizing, your focus should be the integration of your recruiting and internal talent mobility program. If you suffer from low engagement and employee performance, it may be time to focus on the revamp of your performance management and development planning process.  And on and on.

The bottom line is this: companies that work on these "soft" programs dramatically outperform those that don't. The numbers prove it.

Add to del.icio.us   Digg ThisDZone it!

Permalink

About This Analyst

Josh Bersin writes on the ever-changing landscape of business-driven learning, HR and talent management. His favorite topics include strategic talent management, creating high-impact learning organizations, and how organizations drive business change and competitive advantage through talent strategy and technology.


Most Popular Posts

  • Monster.com Launches BeKnown: Professional Social Networking for Facebook
  • The End of a Job as We Know It
  • Predictions For 2012: What Will Next Year Bring?
  • Google Studies Management and Uncovers.... the Fundamentals
  • From E-Learning to We-Learning

Recent Research by This Analyst

Building a Pipeline of Culturally Agile Professionals (Video)

The Shifting Ethos and What It Means For Talent Leadership (Video)

The Shifting Ethos and What It Means For Talent Leadership

Building a Pipeline of Culturally Agile Professionals

The Bold, New CHRO and the Strategic Role of HR in the Year Ahead (Video)

Calendar

<  May 2013  >
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Other Blogs

Hire Innovation
Hire Innovation: Kim Lamoureux
Leadership Drives Business
Leadership Drives Business: KimLamoureux
HRevolution
HRevolution: Brenda Kowske
Learning on the Leading Edge
Learning on the Leading Edge: Vickers/Clarey
Global Trends and Benchmarks
Global Trends and Benchmarks: Karen O'Leonard
Technology for Talent
Technology for Talent: Katherine Jones
Planning for High Performance
Planning for High Performance: Stacia Garr
All Aboard
All Aboard: Madeline Laurano

Archive

2013
  • May (2)
  • April (2)
  • March (1)
  • February (2)
  • January (2)
2012
  • November (4)
  • October (5)
  • September (3)
  • August (6)
  • July (7)
  • June (3)
  • May (7)
  • April (4)
  • March (6)
  • February (7)
  • January (7)
Site Feedback

We would like your feedback on our website. Please send comments, questions or report problems to us at:
» websitefeedback@bersin.com



Email To A Friend Please fill in the following information and we'll email a link to this page. Your Name: Your Email: Recipient's Email: Message (optional): Send

Close

Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
About Us | Contact Us | RSS | Help | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Subscribers to Bersin by Deloitte have access to an extensive library of research materials. Reports and other research materials dated earlier than January 1, 2013 were created by Bersin & Associates LLC, prior to the acquisition of substantially all of the company's assets by Deloitte Consulting LLP, and bear the Bersin brand. Materials dated from January 1, 2013 to the present were created by Deloitte Consulting LLP and bear the Bersin by Deloitte brand.

This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.

As used in this document, "Deloitte" means Deloitte Consulting LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.